Independent utility-specific analysis

Quantify the utility value of DER and energy technologies

A credible business case translates a technology proposal into customer potential, hourly system impacts, program costs and financial results a utility can evaluate.

7 million+utility customer data foundation
8,760 / 15-mincustomer load options
150+ clientsutility, government and corporate
Utility-specificrates, customers and scenarios
Decision-focused analysis

Answer the questions behind a utility purchase, pilot or partnership

Generic market claims rarely provide enough information for a utility decision. MAISY analysis connects the proposed technology with the utility’s customers, load shape, costs and objectives.

The analysis begins with the decision the technology provider and utility need to make. It then applies detailed customer and hourly-load data to estimate who may adopt, how loads change, where and when benefits occur, and whether those benefits justify program and technology costs.

Scenarios can compare program designs, customer segments, rates, fuel prices, technology performance, participation and deployment scale.

Who is a realistic customer?Size the addressable market and identify customer segments with the strongest technical and economic fit.
What changes on the system?Estimate hourly energy, demand, coincidence and local-grid effects.
Who receives the benefit?Separate utility, participating-customer and system-level value.
Does the investment work?Quantify costs, savings, revenue, payback, benefit-cost results, cash flow and NPV.
Evaluation process

From technology proposition to utility-ready evidence

01 / DEFINE

Frame the decision

Specify the technology, utility, customer group, geography, program structure and decision the analysis must support.

02 / MATCH

Identify customers

Use MAISY customer characteristics to estimate technical eligibility, adoption potential and addressable segments.

03 / MODEL

Simulate hourly impacts

Apply technology operation and program participation to customer-level hourly or 15-minute loads.

04 / VALUE

Calculate economics

Reflect rates, energy costs, demand charges, incentives, acquisition, administration and implementation costs.

05 / TEST

Compare scenarios

Evaluate alternative performance, participation, control, pricing and scale assumptions.

06 / PRESENT

Deliver the case

Provide assumptions, findings, financial results and the evidence needed for utility discussion.

Analysis coverage

Technology, program and financial results in one framework

Business cases can be developed for EV charging, batteries, solar, virtual power plants, microgrids, CHP, fuel cells, demand response, smart-grid technologies and other customer-side or distribution applications.

Market and adoption potential
Customer-segment economics
Hourly and peak-load impacts
Avoided energy and demand costs
Incremental utility revenue
Program and technology costs
Participation and sensitivity cases
Payback, B/C, cash flow and NPV
EV and managed charging

Program value and local impacts

Connect residential adoption and charging loads with peak-demand savings, local grid risk, incentives and program economics.

Storage and VPP

Dispatchable customer value

Evaluate the coincidence of customer loads, available storage and utility system requirements.

DER and microgrids

Customer and portfolio economics

Match load requirements with solar, storage, CHP or other resources across customer and geographic segments.

Demand response

Participation and peak effects

Estimate eligible loads, customer response, program costs and system-peak reduction.

Independent role

Analysis—not technology implementation

Jackson Associates independently estimates the utility-specific value of a proposed technology, service or partnership. The results can help a provider demonstrate its offering and the opportunity for a pilot or broader deployment.

This separation makes the analysis more useful to utility decision-makers: assumptions, customer potential, impacts and economics can be examined directly rather than treated as generic marketing claims.

Selected experience

Business-case applications

These examples show how customer and load detail changes the quality of a technology evaluation.

Illustrative Southern California Edison residential EV virtual power plant summer load analysis
Illustrative SCE residential EV/VPP summer load analysis from the original study.

EV virtual power plant

An illustrative Southern California Edison analysis used 5,000 customer records, commuting information and EV battery reserves to examine peak-period discharge and managed overnight recharging.

The original scenario found that 10% participation could offset the modeled residential peak and estimated $560 in savings per participating EV customer. These are historical scenario results, not a current SCE program forecast.

Review the four-page analysis
Smart Grid Research Consortium utility business-case analysis framework
Smart Grid Research Consortium business-case analysis framework.

Smart-grid business cases

The Smart Grid Research Consortium used utility-specific MAISY customer samples to evaluate technologies and programs for 15 cooperative and municipal utilities.

Customer-level impacts were aggregated to estimate system-peak changes, avoided supply costs and utility and customer benefits.

Multi-state microgrid potential

The competitive business-development arm of a large U.S. utility used more than 100,000 MAISY residential and commercial hourly and 15-minute customer loads across several states.

The analysis assessed how customer loads and distributed resources could be combined to evaluate microgrid investment opportunities.

Example results depend on the customers, rates, technology assumptions, participation and study period used in each analysis. New evaluations use current utility-specific inputs and clearly stated assumptions.
Deliverables

Choose the level of ongoing access

Utility-specific report

Jackson Associates performs the analysis and delivers assumptions, customer potential, hourly impacts, financial results and conclusions for direct use in utility discussions.

Report plus data outputs

Add customer-segment tables, hourly load profiles, scenario results and files for utility, consulting or engineering workflows.

Utility-specific model license

When ongoing scenario work is needed, a model can be prepared and licensed for the client to conduct additional utility-specific analysis in-house.

Questions and answers

Utility business-case FAQ

What is a MAISY utility business-case evaluation?

It is an independent utility-specific assessment that connects customer potential and hourly load impacts with rates, avoided costs, program costs, participation and financial results.

Does Jackson Associates sell or implement the technology being evaluated?

No. Jackson Associates independently quantifies the potential utility value of the proposed technology, program or partnership and provides the analysis and results.

Does the analysis require utility AMI interval data?

Many applications can use customer-level data already developed by Jackson Associates, with no customer data transfer, customer contact or utility staff time required for data preparation.

How is the scope and price determined?

A fixed proposal can be based on the utility, geography, technology, customer segments, time detail, scenarios, outputs and intended use. Public one-size-fits-all pricing would be misleading because those requirements vary substantially.

Strengthen the case with utility-specific evidence

Tell us the technology, prospective utility and decision the analysis must support.

Discuss a business-case evaluation