Will adoption cluster?
Income, education, dwelling type, commuting, garage access and housing patterns cause EV ownership to concentrate geographically.
Systemwide EV counts are not enough for distribution planning. Utilities need localized adoption forecasts and hourly charging profiles that reveal clustering, peak coincidence and potential grid exposure.
The same number of EVs can produce very different utility impacts depending on location, charging time and peak coincidence.
Income, education, dwelling type, commuting, garage access and housing patterns cause EV ownership to concentrate geographically.
Arrival times, charging power, energy requirements, season and customer behavior determine the hours that create system and local peaks.
Customer-level charging profiles and diversity determine coincident kW at the transformer, feeder, block-group and service-area levels.
A system forecast may show modest average EV growth while individual neighborhoods experience much higher adoption and peak-hour loading.
Useful for energy and broad resource planning, but potentially weak for identifying concentrated distribution impacts.
Builds localized results from representative customers and then aggregates upward to the planning area required.
GIM combines identity-protected customer records with housing, demographic, transportation, weather and metered end-use information.
Match the utility service area with identity-protected MAISY household records.
Apply income, education, dwelling, commuting and other household characteristics.
Reflect travel, arrival, charger power, energy needs and charging behavior.
Test current, 2030 and 2035 adoption, weather and managed charging assumptions.
Summarize by customer, block group, ZIP, feeder or service area.
Hourly profiles reveal duration, seasonal variation, coincident peaks and the hours available for load shifting.
A peak value alone cannot show whether a constraint occurs for one hour, several consecutive hours or under a specific weather and charging combination.
System planners, distribution engineers and program managers can work from the same underlying customer and hourly-load assumptions.
For utilities with circuit models, GIM outputs can be mapped to feeders, transformers or GIS service areas. Without detailed circuit models, block-group results provide a practical first screen for prioritization.
Localized adoption and hourly-load forecasts create the common foundation for distribution planning, program design and financial analysis.
Identify neighborhoods and block groups where EV growth is most likely to create planning pressure.
Apply user-defined size, loading, planning limits and households-per-transformer assumptions to selected block groups.
Compare future-year unmanaged and managed charging loads before committing to detailed studies or upgrades.
Test participation, engagement, charging shifts and technology alternatives against system and local peak objectives.
Connect G&T demand savings, EV revenue margins, incentives and program costs to payback, NPV and benefit/cost metrics.
Compare managed charging with DSM, DER, battery and VPP strategies under consistent hourly assumptions.
The expanded Grid Impact Model connects these forecasts directly to block-group transformer screening and service-area managed charging economics.
GIM uses curated, identity-protected MAISY customer records and supporting datasets to estimate representative hourly loads and future scenarios.
Utility AMI, GIS and equipment information can strengthen or refine applications where available, but a co-op does not need to complete a major data-integration project before beginning planning-level analysis.
It estimates where, when and how much electric-vehicle charging load will occur. For distribution planning, the forecast should address localized adoption, hourly charging behavior and coincident load at the geographic or grid-asset level relevant to the decision.
Household income, dwelling type, commuting behavior, garage access and other characteristics affect both EV adoption and charging. Modeling representative households allows geographic clustering and load diversity to emerge rather than assuming uniform adoption.
No. Curated identity-protected customer data and supporting datasets provide the initial modeling foundation. AMI data can be incorporated or used for calibration and validation when it is available and suitable.
Yes. GIM compares unmanaged and managed hourly charging, including participation and engagement assumptions, and connects the results with avoided G&T demand charges, program costs and utility financial metrics.
Yes. Localized hourly profiles can be mapped or exported for CYME, Synergi, WindMil, OpenDSS, GIS and other planning workflows. GIM can also provide block-group screening when detailed circuit models are not yet available.
Review a representative customer, block-group and service-area analysis in a guided online demonstration.